Archives

VAXXED II: The People’s Truth

By Horatio Bunce

 

If you have bought into the Covid-19 story that they are “safe and effective” (despite over 13,000 recorded deaths and nearly 600,000 injuries immediately following these vaccines – see https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data ) or bought the lie that they were “94% effective in preventing infection”, but now see that the vaccine manufacturers, the CDC, the FDA are continually spinning data, outright hiding data (like all vaccinated infected since May1), and redefining “cases” or changing testing criteria only in one direction – to promote the increasingly failing vaccines – this should be a red flag for you. Not a rationalization to keep doing the same and take more vaccine “boosters” as if, three (or four or five or…) will now work when two didn’t.

This industry has been just as fraudulent for as long as they have enjoyed legal immunity and no real responsibility for the damages from their products – since at least 1986 with passage of the National Childhood Injury Vaccine Act. The CDC “recommended” vaccines and schedule have ballooned tremendously since that time – and so have the injuries to children, the rate of autism in the United States, and the pharmaceutical company profits. If you were born prior to the 1980’s, you may not realize how many additional vaccines have been added to children by the CDC – that are now part of the “required to go to school” vaccines. You would never have taken the Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Prevnar (which has been pulled because it killed many infants), Gardasil HPV, chicken pox, Prevnar 13, Rotavirus, Hib…and on it goes…ever increasing with no liability risks.

The movie VAXXED chronicled the discovery that the CDC had covered up an internal study that indicated that the still recommended MMR vaccine schedule results in a higher risk of vaccine damage to black male babies. Some simple things, like delaying the CDC schedule to administer the vaccine after 2 years of age greatly diminished the rate of injury, as did simply taking the Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccines as three, stand-alone doses. What was the response of the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers? Demonize Dr. Andrew Wakefield and STOP the production of the stand-alone vaccines, forcing use of the combined MMR vaccine at 18 months that they know damages children – with a predominant risk to black males.   

“In 2016, a media firestorm erupted when Tribeca Film Festival abruptly censored its documentary selection, VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe, amid pressure from pro-pharmaceutical interests. In response to media silence on CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, who admitted to fraud on a pivotal vaccine safety study, VAXXED catapulted to notoriety and became a worldwide trending topic, opening to sold out theater audiences nationwide. Stunned by the immense volume of parents lining up outside the theaters with vaccine injury stories to share, VAXXED producer Polly Tommey began to livestream worldwide reaching millions, and a community that had once been silenced were empowered to rise up. In VAXXED II: The People’s Truth, Polly and the team travel over 50,000 miles in the USA and around the world. Interviews of parents and doctors with nothing to gain and everything to lose exposed the vaccine injury epidemic and asked the question on every parent’s mind, “Are vaccines really as safe and effective as we’ve been told?”

 

<<<CLICK HERE TO WATCH VAXXED II: THE PEOPLE’S TRUTH >>>

CDC Buries Study Finding That Student Masking Has ‘No Statistically Significant Benefit

By Horatio Bunce

Reprinted from Zerohedge

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/cdc-buries-study-showing-student-masking-has-no-statistically-significant-benefit

“But it’s not just this CDC study. There are no studies that Zwieg — or anyone — can find that “show conclusively that kids wearing masks in schools has any effect on their own morbidity or mortality or on hospitalization or death rate in the community around them”:

Meanwhile, as we’ve noted a few times in the past week, there are plenty of studies which conclude that masks provide minimal to no protection.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214

https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736

https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(91)90148-2/pdf90148-2/pdf)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf

https://web.archive.org/web/20200717141836/https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25776/rapid-expert-consultation-on-the-effectiveness-of-fabric-masks-for-the-covid-19-pandemic-april-8-2020

https://www.nap.edu/read/25776/chapter/1#6

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599448/

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y

https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/jide/journal-of-infectious-diseases-and-epidemiology-jide-6-130.php?jid=jide

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1130147308702355

So why are we making American kids wear oat bags every day?”

CDC “logic”

by Horatio Bunce

This sums up the current CDC and Tennessee Department of Health logic on forcing Coronahoax vaccines.

 

Originally posted by Zerohedge commenter blueseas:

ME: CDC, should I get poked if I already had Covid?

CDC: “Yes, you should be poked regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”

ME: Oh, okay, we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. Got it. So, how long does poke-induced immunity last?

CDC: “There is still a lot we are learning about COVID-19 pokes and CDC is constantly reviewing evidence and updating guidance. We don’t know how long protection lasts for those who are poked.”

ME: Okay … but wait a second. I thought you said the reason I need the poke was because we don’t know how long my natural immunity lasts, but it seems like you’re saying we ALSO don’t know how long poke immunity lasts either. So, how exactly is the poke immunity better than my natural immunity?

CDC: …

ME: Uh … alright. But, haven’t there been a bunch of studies suggesting that natural immunity could last for years or decades?

CDC: Yes.

NEWYORKTIMES: “Years, maybe even decades, according to a new study.”

ME: Ah. So natural immunity might last longer than poke immunity?

CDC: Possibly. You never know.

Continue reading

Tennessee Department of Health Data shows “fully” Vaccinated infected with Covid have more than 3X fatality rate vs. Unvaccinated

“Case” drop immediately after Biden inauguration. Total Covid IFR for all cases at 0.6%

By Horatio Bunce

 

I am going to write this post with the assumption that: the reader has some knowledge of the RT-PCR (PCR) test that has been used for coronavirus testing for the last 16+ months to declare positive “cases” of Covid-19 and how it is utilized with amplification cycles multiplying the nasal swab sample material, that it is not an “approved” test for this purpose, that it is only “authorized for emergency use” for coronavirus testing, that it can be run in such a way as to virtually guarantee a positive result if desired and that it was never intended to be used as a health condition diagnostic tool according to its creator Kary Mullis, that PCR amplification cycles above 30 generate a tremendous number of either false positive results or at best positive results in persons that are incapable of spreading disease because of small viral load and that even higher PCR amplification cycles make it easier to call a result positive with no symptoms of any kind. If you don’t know what any of this is about, let me know in the comments and I can provide more info.

What you can understand, even if you do not know the details of how the PCR test works, is that the state’s data is currently showing that “fully vaccinated” persons infected with Covid-19 are dying and being hospitalized at much higher rates than unvaccinated persons. In fact, the July 22, 2021 data for Tennessee now shows the fatality rate for the “fully vaccinated” that get infected is more than three times higher than for the unvaccinated. The hospitalization rate for the “fully vaccinated” is at 19%. There is a good reason for this. They have been cheating the data in favor of the vaccinated to promote “vaccines”(*) and now it is biting them in the rear. Allow me to explain why.

Vaccinated persons who then are infected with Coronavirus have 3 times higher chance of death than unvaccinated.

(*) I use quotes around the word “vaccine” in regard to the mRNA gene therapies by Moderna and Pfizer as these are not traditional vaccines in any sense as the term was used prior to 2020.  There is no isolated, purified, inactive or live virus within them – as within for instance, an influenza vaccine. These mRNA therapies are experimental products that have never been tested on humans until now. Just another part of the deception to promote these, calling them something they are not in order to promote their acceptance.

 

Continue reading

BLM and Proud Boys – funded by same operation?

by Horatio Bunce

https://gab.com/RobertPatrickLewis/posts/106220334464682072

“Until the FBI explains why BLM subversive John Sullivan, who video shows was (sic) the only armed member of ThE iNsUrReCtIoN, was released from their custody in <12hrs, assume that he was their asset and January 6th was their operation.

Prove me wrong.

Please.”

 

If you aren’t familiar with John Sullivan, he was active within BLM in Utah and Oregon and was identified by the western “antifa” ranks as an agent provocateur. He has past ties to FBI. His is the video referred to here, showing the “capitol police officer” (or at least his cuff-link and bejeweled wrist) allegedly shooting unarmed military psyop division veteran  “Ashli Babbit” and the aftermath of fakery, destruction of the murder scene evidence by “trained professionals”, etc.

Take a look as even eyewitnesses there that day call them out as “actors”:

If John Sullivan, the Agitator at the Capitol, Is Not BLM/ Antifa, Who Does He Work For?

According to the article linked above, his brother James, “is a pro-Trump activist who helped organize the January 6 “Stop the Steal” rally in Washington, DC.  James is affiliated with the Proud Boys”. James Sullivan called for Black/ minority Republicans to confront Antifa at the city’s Black Lives Matter Plaza on January 6, which could have led to violence.  James Sullivan is the founder of the Utah-based ‘Civilized Awakening’ group that supports Trump’s agenda and is a sharp critic of Black Lives Matter.”

Gee, what are the odds his brother was organizing the “other” side?

“Raw footage filmed by [John] Sullivan inside the Capitol and published on his [John’s] personal YouTube channel shows him [John] in rapport with Trump supporters, even offering them his knife to get through a locked door. He urged the crowd to commit acts of violence.”

So by January 6th, John had moved from Antifa/BLM agent provocateur to Trump Rally provocateur – but he had prior experience playing both sides in the fake war:

“[John] Sullivan currently is in trouble in Provo, Utah, his hometown, where he is facing charges for inciting a riot and criminal mischief in July 2020 in a protest against police. He is accused of kicking vehicles, threatening motorists, and urging protesters to block traffic. A female driving an SUV was stopped by the protesters and shot by one of his associates. Blumenthal says the incident led to the formation of the Utah Citizen’s Militia and galvanized right-wing forces across the state. Days later, John organized a rally and armed militia members counter-protested across the street. John invited several members of the Proud Boys and militia activists to address his crowd, and has had other contact with the Proud Boys. Very strange behavior, indeed.

Conveniently: “Their father is a retired Army Lt. Col. whose name has been withheld at the request of several acquaintances of the family.

Folks need to wake up to the fact that the US Government alphabet agencies are embedded and acting as provocateurs in both left (antifa) and right (proud boys) organizations. Their coordinated false flags will continue to be used to erode liberty and employ even greater unconstitutional government controls.

Tennessee Republican Super-majority in Senate Judiciary Committee Refuse to Repeal Unconstitutional Law

by Horatio Bunce

One of my arguments regarding Tennessee law and upholding our constitutions, that is, to stop infringing upon the rights enumerated in our state and federal constitutions with current unconstitutional legislation in place, is that the legislation required to do this is quite simple. We do not need additional, new “laws” to codify these rights (such as Bill Lee’s Fake Constitutional Carry legislation which is not constitutional). Many issues can be corrected by simply repealing the existing unconstitutional (and therefore illegal) state laws on the books. This particularly applies in regards to the unconstitutional “law” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1307 which states that:

(a)

(1) A person commits an offense who carries, with the intent to go armed, a firearm or a club.

(2)

(A) The first violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class C misdemeanor, and, in addition to possible imprisonment as provided by law, may be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500).
(B) A second or subsequent violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class B misdemeanor.
(C) A violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor if the person’s carrying of a handgun occurred at a place open to the public where one (1) or more persons were present.

Of course, this “law” is a blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – and in fact is in conflict with other existing unconstitutional “permit” law, such as Bill Lee’s Fake Constitutional Carry. How exactly does one carry a firearm (or club), even with a Fake Constitutional Carry permit, and not “go armed”? This is shoddy legal work, missing definitions and intentionally ambiguous such that I suppose any “law enforcement” officer or judge can decide for themselves what your “intent” is in keeping and bearing your arms. It makes a misdemeanor criminal of any and every person carrying a handgun in public where one or more persons is present. Well duh, it takes at least one person to carry the weapon. Really brilliant “law” work here. The state of Tennessee is currently in the criminal position of depriving residents of  Constitutional rights with this “law”.

There was a bill in current legislative session, SB1391, sponsored by Sen. Janice Bowling that would repeal this unconstitutional “law” while leaving the other provisions within the section prohibiting firearm possession by convicted felons, etc. I.e., it would remove the unconstitutional portion infringing on the right to keep and bear arms and stop criminalizing the act of non-felons exercising a constitutional right. This is actually REQUIRED by the U.S. Constitution and those taking oaths to defend the Constitution, uphold it, etc. should be pursuing this sort of action.

So, what did the 7-1 Republican Super-majority Senate Judicial Committee do with the bill? Not a damn thing. They wouldn’t even make a motion to discuss it. Here are the parties involved:

Mike Bell (R), Dawn White (R), Paul Rose (R),  Todd Gardenhire (R), Sara Kyle (D), Jon Lundberg (R), Kerry Roberts (R), John Stevens (R).  Katrina Robinson (D) was not present, so the Republicans enjoyed a 7-1 majority and wouldn’t move on restoring constitutional rights.

 

Link to video here:http://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=610&clip_id=24634&meta_id=591892

 

Mike Bell does some tap dancing at the end to explain that somehow there was a mix-up on an amendment that was pulled right before noon, so the OIG office was told to not bother testifying on this bill and now they would want to, blah, blah, blah. What difference does it make? IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS CRIMINAL FOR THIS GOVERNMENT TO KEEP DOING IT. IT SHOULD BE REPEALED. Who cares what the OIG says? Besides, if you will pay close attention to the first of the video, Janice states that drafting code 4096 amendment makes the bill. There are no Senate amendments listed for this bill. So is there an amendment or not? Since the General Assembly website still shows ZERO amendments on the Senate bill, is there zero, one (as declared by Bowling) or two (as implied by Bell)? Once again, Tennesseans are kept in the dark about legislators’ backroom discussions, side deals, required amendments to “get your bill through”, dog and pony show testimonials from various lobbyists against the people, etc. such as the Tennessee Sheriff’s Association. Many times we cannot even see the amendments that are being read and debated live by committees. Those who have attempted to track the sausage-making in Nashville are familiar with how impossible it is at times to even be informed on legislation before it is voted upon – let alone contact the legislators about to vote on your behalf. This bill, however, is quite simple. There should be no deals required. Republicans not making a motion on this bill feigning wanting to give a state agency with financial conflict of interest to keep infringing on constitutional rights is no excuse.

Tennessee Republicans have enjoyed a supermajority for over TEN YEARS with no impediments to these types of corrections EXCEPT FOR REPUBLICANS. They cannot blame the Democratic party. The fault lies with the Republicans. Also note that the typical “fiscal note” was attached to this bill declaring that the state would lose millions of dollars if they cannot continue to infringe on constitutional rights of law-abiding, non-felon gun owners.  These criminal protection racket fiscal notes are continually attached to bills seeking to restore 2nd amendment rights to Tennesseans. It is just too expensive for government to let go of their criminal infringement taxes. This is nothing less than constitutional right-abridging theft by our state government and is not an excuse to continue unconstitutional infringements. State government has been controlled by a super-majority of Republicans for over 10 years now. How much of your life is left to keep waiting on them? It appears that all seven of these members might need to go.  At least they should make a show of a 4-3 split and keep playing the “we need to close our private political party primaries so the RINOs don’t keep getting elected by us” game. 

The Thing about Speeding: NMA E-Newsletter #627

By guest writer Eric Peters

The problem with speed limits is they’re arbitrary and presumptive.

A velocity maximum is decreed, and you are presumed a threat to others if you exceed it. Almost everyone understands this is silly—else almost everyone would not “speed” routinely. Most of us do not play Russian roulette, for instance, irrespective of any laws forbidding it, because we don’t need to be threatened with a ticket to refrain from putting a loaded gun to our heads.

Almost everyone understands that driving five, ten mph, or even faster than above whatever the speed limit is isn’t like that. That “breaking” the speed limit is like stepping on sidewalk cracks and not likely to break your momma’s back. It is why few feel shame or guilt when “caught” going faster than the speed limit. Indeed, the opposite is likely true. Drivers resent being extorted by the courts and insurance mafia over something we know caused no harm and was not likely to cause harm.

Interestingly, this defeats the supposed purpose of speed limits if the purpose isn’t to pretextually fleece motorists.

Ostensibly, speed limits are posted—gird yourself—for “our safety.” It is an almost mathematical axiom that the very last thing intended is the plain meaning of those two words when you hear those two words.

An altogether different meaning is intended, which can be demonstrated by pointing out how useless speed limits are as information about how fast or not it is safe to drive on any given road, especially an unfamiliar one.

This ought to be the purpose of speed limits—advisory rather than arbitrary. Suppose limits convey useful information about speed in relation to the road ahead instead of the set-deliberately-below-the-speed most people drive on that road. More might actually drive the advisory speed limit. Inevitably, most drivers ignore the posted limits and see them as easy pickings for on-the-go tax collection.

Part of the problem is vocabulary.

A speed limit sounds like some engineering threshold, like an engine’s RPM limit. Exceed the redline, and engine damage is probable because the engine’s mechanical limits have been exceeded.

Most people take care not to exceed the redline because they know it has objective informational value, and they’d better pay attention to it.

But a speed limit is nothing like that. It is a statutory limit—something illegal to exceed because it has been so decreed but not necessarily harmful in and of itself.

It is obviously not an objective threshold beyond which danger lies, which is why most people do speed, regardless of any statute. General contempt for speed limits is universal, which undermines “our safety.”

It is not because people “speed,” but because the correlation between the signage and conditions is so tenuous that most of us ignore the signs unless police are in the vicinity. While some drive too slowly relative to the speed, the rest of us are driving to make sure that traffic does not needlessly bunch up when it could be flowing much more smoothly. This sets up a bizarre and irritating dynamic.

The speed limit obeyers are often taking a kind of righteous delight in their rigid obedience, which in their minds justifies not yielding to the drivers exceeding the speed limit because they are breaking the law!  While the “speeders” understandably get exasperated by the “slowpoke” ahead who is preventing them from driving at a speed they know isn’t dangerous, even if statutorily unlawful.

If “our safety” rather than our money is desired, the gov, perhaps, should post speed advisories with no fines attached.

This would benefit drivers not familiar with a given road by giving them a sound ballpark idea about how fast they ought to enter an unfamiliar curve, for instance. They would be given heed for the sake of safety as opposed to fear of a fine.

Because we have speed limits, people tend to either completely ignore them—knowing they can likely take the curve up ahead at ten or even twenty MPH faster than the sign says is “safe” (even at the risk of a ticket) because they have been driving that road and taking that curve every day for the past ten years at ten or even twenty MPH faster than the sign says is “safe.”

If a driver is not familiar with the road and has not taken the curve up ahead every day for the past ten years, they see the sign that says twenty-five MPH and creates a road hazard by driving preposterously slow for the curve. The next time they take that road, they’ll probably ignore the sign, like almost everyone else.

Motorists then habituate a combination of contempt for the signage as well as mindless obedience of signage irrespective of conditions, and neither is of much service to the cause of “our safety.” The entire regime is as counterproductive and cynical as it is profitable.

This explains why probably speed limits as absolute won’t end anytime soon.

Eric Peters lives in Virginia and enjoys driving cars and motorcycles. In the past, Eric worked as a car journalist for many prominent mainstream media outlets. Currently, he focuses his time writing auto history books, reviewing cars, and blogging about cars+ for his website EricPetersAutos.com.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in this newsletter are those of the author.

Source: https://www.motorists.org/alerts/the-thing-about-speeding-nma-e-newsletter-627/

PCR test

https://lbry.tv/@Alin:7/Kary-Mullis-gives-his-thoughts-on-Dr.-Fauci:1

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/18/pcr-test-reliability.aspx

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus

https://humantruth.net/the-pcr-game/

Stop blaming the coronavirus!