Archives

Dude, where’s my Bitcoin?

photo: www.cointelegraph.com

by Horatio Bunce

 

As the Bitcoin crypto-currency bubble expands from $12000 to $13000 in one day, the cryptocurrency market cap now exceeds that of Citigroup (over $220 Billion). For electrons…..that are “mined”….by solving math problems with computers. Sounds legit.

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon (the pot) previously called the cryptocurrency kettle “black”:

“You can’t have a business where people can invent currencies out of thin air and think that people who are buying it are really smart. It’s worse than Tulip Bulbs; it won’t end well. It’ll eventually blow up; it’s a fraud.”

Ironically, he wasn’t talking about the federal reserve notes electronically created out of thin air they trade every day. So of course, JP Morgan will now engage in trading futures on the cryptocurrency they declared “a fraud”.

Meanwhile,

Largest Crypto-Mining Exchange Confirms It Was Hacked, Over $50 Million In Bitcoin Stolen

Gee, who could see that coming…electronic theft of fake electron “money”….and how does Bitcoin, on this good news today of its immediate disappearability (new word) increase in “value” 8% IN ONE DAY?

 

 

Thought for the Day

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=83182

by Horatio Bunce

Does anyone else think it strange that the guys that are so poor they don’t have lights at night have the funding and skills to simultaneously complete the Manhattan Project and Space Race?

What could possibly go wrong?

https://libertymaniacs.deviantart.com/art/1984-INGSOC-Thoughtcrime-Print-213414138

by Horatio Bunce

Facebook Announces It Will Use A.I. To Scan Your Thoughts “To Enhance User Safety”

Under the guise of “suicide prevention”, Facebook is allegedly using artificial intelligence to evaluate its users and engage government intervention to “save lives”.

 

Kind of reminds me of the same excuse used by Columbia University/Pfizer with their evil TeenScreen program that declared 84% of screened kids “mentally ill” and subsequently put many of them on black-box-warning SSRI psychotropic drugs….that instead of preventing suicide, help turn them into homicidal maniacs (see Columbine, Kip Kingle, Red Lake Minnesota, Virginia Tech shootings for example) which is exactly why they were outlawed in some European nations. But it was all “for the children” and “saving lives”.

 

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg praised the product update in a post today, writing that “In the future, AI will be able to understand more of the subtle nuances of language, and will be able to identify different issues beyond suicide as well, including quickly spotting more kinds of bullying and hate.

 

By curtailing frivolous and “fighting” words, the Party seeks to narrow the range of thought altogether, such that eventually thoughtcrime will be literally impossible. The same goes for disruptive or subversive behavior.
George Orwell
1984

 

Political Chicken

Untouched photo shows yearbook signature is fraud – 2 color inks, 2 different handwritings – credit: Thomas Wictor

by Horatio Bunce

 

If only Republicans had been as rabid in their demand that Ted Cruz “step aside” from the presidential race when five women claimed he engaged in “sexual misconduct” with a woman other than his wife as they have Roy Moore on the same level of “evidence” (except for them also knowing Cruz’s PAC gave $500,000 to one of the women’s employers in the Carly Fiorina campaign)…then maybe I could take the same useless dolts seriously that also wouldn’t impeach Bill Clinton despite the claims of Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Connie Hamzy, Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Sandra James, Christy Zercher, Monica Lewinsky, Elizabeth Gracen, Dolly Browning, Sally Perdue, Susie Whitacre and Bobbie Ann Williams.

By the way, shouldn’t there have been a Cruz vs. National Enquirer defamation lawsuit by now? We are often reminded of what a smart lawyer Cruz is so…what’s the holdup?

The reason there hasn’t been one is the same reason the Rubio campaign held that Cruz information for leverage to defend Rubio’s own “sexual misconduct” if necessary. That’s a very important thing to remember any time you see these two operating in Congress. They are leveraged, compromised. How much of what they do every day in Congress is blackmailed?

Which brings me to Roy Moore.

Why now? If these allegations are true, then a lot of people know about the alleged philandering character of Roy Moore and they have known this for a long time. They have allowed him to achieve very high levels of political office in their state. And did nothing – that we know of. As hated as Roy Moore is by the left (for at least the last 16 years on the national stage), even after the “Roy’s Rock” ten commandments saga and the ignore unconstitutional federal supreme court Obergefell orders case, no one in media had this information? No one wanted to take Roy down enough until now? He was too powerful you might say. Is he not now more powerful than before? If the allegations are true, then is not Roy Moore also leveraged? Or more to the point, hasn’t he been for a long time? Has his usefulness suddenly expired for those holding the leverage? What are the odds that the Washington Post could simultaneously discover the existence of four women from his past, locate and interview them – just in time after Luther Strange gets spanked in the primary?

If the allegations are true, someone had this information compiled and was holding onto it, waiting for an opportune time to use it. They are not interested in justice (though it may be due).

Why isn’t Republican-ambulance-chaser Gloria Allred interested in “justice” for the victims she allegedly represents?

“Allred called for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a public hearing where Nelson would voluntary appear and testify before lawmakers on the incident.”

A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing? How about filing a civil or criminal suit in Alabama – you know, the actual jurisdiction? Is it because Gloria Allred is not licensed there? Is her show-boating and offering legal services in Alabama illegal since she is not listed as an Alabama state bar member and neither are any of the attorneys in her firm? Or is the truth that what she is doing ISN’T actually practicing law OR offering legal services?

More importantly, if Roy Moore does not “step aside”, what “fullest extent” legal action will Allred pursue? Is it in reality NONE since neither she nor her firm are licensed in Alabama? Or could Roy Moore write a big check like Bill Clinton did to Paula Jones to “make it all go away”? Maybe send a big check to Luther Strange’s PAC like Ted Cruz did for Carly Fiorina (and everyone forgets until next time they need to remember and leverage you again).  If Moore drops out, will there be a sudden void where that demand for justice was just days before? Will those five “sexual misconduct” (whatever that means) lawsuits never materialize?

 

So I have to weigh those Republicans making statements denouncing, removing support, blah, blah, blah without a claim, without a lawsuit, without sworn testimony (despite the fake “yearbook signature” and Allred’s alleged victim apparently having also attended the Robbie Parker Sandy Hook No-Tears acting school) and their records, their deeds and their fraud foisted on the American people (Ryan, McConnell, ISIS McCain, Gay-marriage executive order Romney, Bailout Bob Corker, TPP Ted Cruz, et al) plus Gloria Allred (and yes, FOX NEWS also “Judge” Jeanine, Hannity, Ingraham no less than controlled opposition in this one) teaming up to attempt another Evan ISIS McMullen style “independent” write-in for Alabama.

 

When you idiots actually passed a law admitting that you will use our tax dollars to feed us propaganda, we know you are intentionally lying to us at least part of the time. The only decision to make is what not to believe.

Lamar! demands removal of Confederate Statue, recommends worshipping plagiarist fraud instead

photo credit: flickr Joel Kramer

Playboy author and plagiarist fraud Alex Haley idol in Knoxville

By Horatio Bunce

Sorry, I just couldn’t let this go. I see the “party of Lincoln” is still sending their Freedman’s Bureau agents in to create strife between free blacks and whites. Folks, this little event should plainly reveal to you just what kind of character Lamar Alexander is – and how he, like the Freedman’s Bureau agents, is still baiting and exploiting the black man today with his version of the Bureau’s false promise of “40 acres and a mule”.

WKRN in Nashville reported a couple of weeks ago that Lamar! was calling for the removal of the bust of Nathan Bedford Forrest inside the state capitol building:

“The senator said there “is a place to honor” all of those in the Civil War whether it be the “battlefield, birthplaces or museums” but “places of honor should be for those who inspire all of us.”

He then said, “There is a place for General Forrest’s bust, but not in a place of honor at the state capitol.”

 

Forgetting for the moment that Lamar! did not mention where “a place” would be for confederate monuments, I would think that Nathan Bedford Forrest might be a worthy example of the era to promote –  if the goal were truly racial unity, not that many people ever enter the state capitol building for that sort of thing. I believe he is a great example of the power of God to change people, make them new creations in Christ. But then maybe I am expecting too much of a U.S. Secretary of Education to know about U.S. history, heck, his own home state history for that matter. As an alternative, Lamar! suggests that this place of honor in the capitol building should go to other Tennesseans such as Alex Haley:

“Instead, he said that place of honor should have Tennesseans like “Roots” author Alex Haley, Senator Howard Baker, or World War I hero Sgt. Alvin York.”

Ah yes, the alleged “Roots” “author” Alex Haley. Playboy magazine author Alex Haley. Plagiarist fraud Alex Haley. Surely a U.S. Secretary of Education and actual contemporary of Alex Haley would remember that Haley was sued for stealing significant portions of “Roots” from “The African”, a work of fiction by a white man, Harry Courlander written in the 1960’s. The plagiarism trial happened in 1978 when Lamar! was walking across the state in his plaid shirt campaigning for governor. After the presentation by the prosecution, the defense “settled” rather than proceed with the case. Further, it has been proven that many of Haley’s claims regarding his “ancestors” in the book cannot be true.

Alex Haley’s Fraudulent Roots

‘Roots’ Plagiarism Suit Is Settled

But it isn’t like Alexander is not aware of all this. Unlike Nathan Bedford Forrest, whose history we might forgive Lamar! for not knowing, Haley was a “close friend” of Lamar! according to Vanderbilt University which has received his correspondence with Alexander as part of the “pre-Senate” papers donated for an exhibit there:

Other highlights are the papers of Honey Alexander and correspondence with Alexander’s close friend, author Alex Haley. Haley and Minnie Pearl were co-chairs of Homecoming ’86, a statewide celebration that provided Tennesseans an opportunity to rediscover their past and identify the uniqueness of their communities.”

You may also remember that Lamar! invited Haley to co-chair (with Minnie Pearl) the 1986 Tennessee Homecoming campaign.  So, he knows Haley. He likely knows he was a plagiarist fraud. He likely knows Haley exploited the lives of slaves in America for a dollar, stole from Harry Courlander to foist a fraudulent “history” of his “ancestors” on America and sell it as the truth. Lamar! likely knows “Roots” is a lie.

So why does Lamar! insist on continuing to promote this fraud as hero? Could it be we really have no interest in the truth about either Nathan Bedford Forrest or Alex Haley? Is it more important that Haley’s fraudulent work has “shaped the contemporary African American consciousness” with lies?

Read the fine print

Government ‘Aid’ Makes Disasters Worse

By Ron Paul

Texans affected by Hurricane Harvey, including my family and me, appreciate the outpouring of support from across the country. President Donald Trump has even pledged to donate one million dollars to relief efforts. These private donations will be much more valuable than the as much as 100 billion dollars the federal government is expected to spend on relief and recovery. Federal disaster assistance hinders effective recovery efforts, while federal insurance subsidies increase the damage caused by natural disasters.

Federal disaster aid has existed since the early years of the republic. In fact, it was a payment to disaster victims that inspired Davy Crockett’s “Not Yours to Give” speech. However, the early federal role was largely limited to sending checks. The federal government did not become involved in managing disaster relief and recovery until the 20th century. America did not even have a federal agency dedicated solely to disaster relief until 1979, when President Jimmy Carter created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by executive order. Yet, Americans somehow managed to rebuild after natural disasters before 1979. For example, the people of Galveston, Texas successfully rebuilt the city following a major hurricane that destroyed the city in 1900.

FEMA’s well-documented inefficiencies are the inevitable result of centralizing control over something as complex as disaster recovery in a federal bureaucracy. When I served in Congress, I regularly voted against federal disaster aid for my district. After the votes, I would hear from angry constituents, many of whom would later tell me that after dealing with FEMA they agreed that Texas would be better off without federal “help.”

Following natural disasters, individuals who attempt to return to their own property — much less try to repair the damage — without government permission can be arrested and thrown in jail. Federal, state, and local officials often hinder or even stop voluntary rescue and relief efforts.

FEMA is not the only counterproductive disaster assistance program. The National Flood Insurance Program was created to provide government-backed insurance for properties that could not obtain private insurance on their own. By overruling the market’s verdict that these properties should not be insured, federal flood insurance encourages construction in flood-prone areas, thus increasing the damage caused by flooding.

Just as payroll taxes are unable to fully fund Social Security and Medicare, flood insurance premiums are unable to fund the costs of flood insurance. Federal flood insurance was almost $25 billion in the red before Hurricane Harvey. Congress will no doubt appropriate funding to pay all flood insurance claims, thus increasing the national debt. This in turn will cause the Federal Reserve to print more money to monetize that debt, thus hastening the arrival of the fiscal hurricane that will devastate the US economy. Yet, there is little talk of offsetting any of the costs of hurricane relief with spending cuts!

Congress should start phasing out the federal flood insurance program by forbidding the issuance of new flood insurance policies. It should also begin reducing federal spending on disaster assistance. Instead, costs associated with disaster recovery should be made 100-percent tax-deductible. Those who suffered the worst should be completely exempted from all federal tax liability for at least two years. Tax-free savings accounts could also help individuals save money to help them bear the costs of a natural disaster.

The outpouring of private giving and volunteer relief efforts we have witnessed over the past week shows that the American people can effectively respond to natural disasters if the government would get out of their way.

Source: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2017/september/04/government-aid-makes-disasters-worse/

GOD AND COUNTRY PETITION NEWSLETTER EXPRESS – THE HEALTH CARE PROPOSAL

Good evening my friends,

I know it has been a long time since a newsletter has gone out. For all purposes the “God and Country Petition” is a dead issue and will NOT continue. We gave it a good try but in could not come to fruition. However, a lot of what was in my petition, President Trump is trying to accomplish, such as the repeal of Obamacare, the repeal of the Dodd-Frank Bill, illegal immigration, building our military & defenses and more.

The proposed health care bill has been a major issue and confusing to say the least. I have been following the house version of the bill and now the proposed senate version of the bill, which may come to a vote and passage as early as this week. Personally I hope it does not, I feel it is being rushed and there are problems within the proposed Republican senate version!

Below are two attachments, the first attachment is the proposed Republican Party senate version of the bill, broken out section by section in a summary fashion, in short, this is not the garbled up actual proposed bill! This is a summery that was prepared by a US senators committee on health care for their constituents, it contains 142 pages. As simplified as it was mad in comparison to the actual bill, it is still confusing.

The second attachment is a proposal I created, with the help of many of you reading this newsletter, my version is only 6 pages long!

My feelings partially are as follows on the proposed Republican Party version before the senate to be voted on. I must say, there was not only a lot of reading in what is in the proposed Republican Party version in the first attachment above but dissecting it and understanding it was even more of a challenge for me, it may not be for many of you reading it!

I understood some of what I read but did not understand other parts of it as well. Section 102 I have many problems with, I feel it is discriminatory in many ways. I also feel the formula proposed will come back to haunt us many times over!

I felt this from the beginning as evidenced in my proposal in the second attachment above, the formula for calculating premiums, in my opinion, needed to be a blended actuary table based on the entire population of the American people.

By banding those in the senior age brackets or pre-existing conditions, or segregating other segments of the population is a bad thing. However, income brackets are an entirely different issue in itself. My proposal has subsidies based on income brackets. I feel very strongly that section 102 needs a lot of soul searching by each member of the senate as well as realizing the consequences that will go along with it!

Section 103 – 105, I don’t see any glaring problems. Please don’t take me wrong, this is an improvement over the house version and as far as Obamacare, that is not even on the table for discussion!

Section 106, good in some ways, bad in others. I feel the dollar amounts need to be higher, especially spread amongst 50 states.

The new subsection (I), which would establish a Long-Term State Stability and Innovation Program is good. It appears to make funding available to all 50 states and the District of Columbia from CY2019 through CY2026.

If I am reading this right, a state would be required to submit an application to the CMS Administrator to receive any federal funding to carry-out specified activities in the state, which were outlined in those 3 activities listed. That I felt was good.

Sections 107 through 119, I saw no problems with. Section 120, I am not sure of, too vague for me at this time, I need to research. Section 121 through 124 more in detail. If anyone reading this can help me out on it, I would appreciate it!

Sections 125 and 126 there are a lot of problems with it, in my opinion. I feel our senators need to go back to the drawing board and get their heads together on these issues. Hear again, I feel there are many discriminatory areas in these two sections that will come back to haunt us. These two sections need to be clarified re-worked and put in plain English for all to understand!

Section 133 in my opinion could cause more problems than it is worth. Hear again, we are using actuary tables based on individual states in many areas, rather than the aggregate of all 50 states and the entire US population. Section A however, does use aggregate and Federal averages of medical assistance matching percentages.

I also see threw out this proposal there are many areas that a state can opt out of participating in certain things that could take away benefits from its residents that other states may have. In short, I see a lack of a lot of uniformity with this proposal. In my opinion, it lacks the all for one, one for all approach!

I may be all wrong in my analysis, this is why I included my proposal above for all of you to view. This is a very complex issue facing this nation and the American people. We may not be able to push this through as fast as some would like it to be. It just seems like a lot of work needs to be done with this proposal to make it as palatable as possible for the American people.

I will say this in closing and I am not saying this because I am a senior but the elderly, especially the 50 to 65 year old, will have many pains to face with this proposal, as I read it, which I am the first that will say I am open to be corrected!

As I had said, these are my opinions as I see it, you may see it differently and I am open to be corrected on anything I have stated in this newsletter. I do not like it in its present form! I hope and pray, the Republican Party senators do what is right for all the American people, equally, with this so critical bill before us all!

I ask each of you to please take an interest in reading my e-mail and the senate version of the proposed bill and my proposal, both attachments are above! If any of you feel what I am proposing has merit, will you please send out my newsletter and the attachments to everyone you know as well as posting it on Facebook, U-Tube or any other social media you may belong to, if you do, I will be beholding to you. This repeal and replacement of Obamacare is so critical to all of us, please don’t ignore this!!

God speed to all of you and thank you,

JS
John A. Smaldone
God and Country petition
http://www.usa-godandcountry-petition.com/

 

Attachment 1     Attachment 2