by Horatio Bunce
Almost time for the new cell-phone ban law to go into effect. But the Tennessee Republican super majority made sure the new law doesn’t apply to “law enforcement”. They can do whatever they want, putting others in danger – and issue citations to you for the exact same activity. The Tennessee legislature loves to use the “Mom, all the other kids are doing it” rationale when justifying their bills often times using law in other states as some kind of precedent and apparently we all need to be the same as the other kids. I guess maybe they didn’t look at what is happening to other states where “law enforcement” drives distracted. Or maybe like Arlingon, they too think Tennessee “law enforcement” will be “above the fray” and have special, different brains from everyone else and can multitask on their computer, radio, cell phone all at the same time. Think it isn’t happening already in Tennessee? Stay tuned for Part 3.
Another reason, among many, why it isn’t a good idea to house pretrial detainee inmates in the Blount County jail. The arsenic gravy on top of the horse biscuit is that the Blount County Sheriff’s Office didn’t even know about this until the press contacted them.
Why Do We Blame Women For Prohibition?
Today marks the 100 year history of the ratification of the alcohol prohibition amendment. Prohibition of alcohol was a failure, like prohibition of marijuana. At least 100 years ago, the federal government sought an amendment to take such action, where today it just acts, often without authority.
Recipient of last year’s Eagle Award, then Blount County Commissioner Tona Monroe, will be the speaker at the 4th annual Truth Radio Bill of Rights Banquet on Tuesday December 18th. The topic of the speech will be Proof of Authority and the Proper Role of Government: The Foundation of a Constitutional Republic.
A dinner will be held at 7 PM at RJ’s Courtyard located at 3749 Airport Hwy, Louisville, Tennessee 37777. Book your meal by calling WBCR at 984-1470.
The National Motorists Association (NMA) is a grassroots alliance of motorists joined together to protect the rights of drivers in their vehicles, on the streets, and in the courts. Formed in 1982, the NMA lobbies for traffic regulations and enforcement actions based on safety considerations. Too often traffic enforcement is influenced by ticket quotas and revenue goals. And when for-profit companies, such as red-light and speed camera vendors, are contracted by municipalities to take over any of the enforcement responsibility, the quest for revenue has frequently become a corrupting influence. That makes it all the more important that an organization like the NMA exists to serve as the primary advocate for its members and the driving public at large.
The pillars of the NMA’s mission:
- Traffic laws fairly written and reasonably enforced
- Full due process rights for motorists
- Traffic penalties based on sensible standards that differentiate between responsible and unsafe behaviors
- Reasonable highway user fees assessed for maintaining and improving highway infrastructure, not for wasteful overhead or political boondoggles
- Traffic safety produced by sound engineering solutions, not gotcha tactics designed to generate revenue
- Driver education that emphasizes early development of advanced driving skills
National Motorists Association members number in the thousands and are active in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and in several provinces and territories of Canada. For more information, visit https://www.motorists.org/.
by Horatio Bunce
Are you falling for the Big Two’s latest ruse, the Blasey-Ford vs. Kavanaugh circus? Isn’t it obvious that the “I can’t remember” allegations are so flimsy they were designed to fail – kind of like the hidden smiley-face in Obama’s provided birth certificate? When the Big Two show becomes this obvious, you should recognize the DC Uniparty is once again conspiring against the American people and distracting you with a fake display of R vs. D “partisanship”. It has one main purpose: to distract you from the true nature of what they are complicit in foisting upon you. In this case, it has reduced the discussion of Brett Kavanaugh’s merits as a judge to what he may or may not have done at an alleged 1980’s high school party that no one can remember taking place. Do you know anything about his judicial record? Has the CFR-controlled, Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, fake news given you any information related to his judicial record, or has it all been the insipid Democrat claims and demands for FBI investigations into Blasey-Ford’s now very perjured accusations? Did it succeed in distracting you from Trump’s latest approval of yet another massive $852 Billion spending bill, you know, like the last $1.3 Trillion one in March that he said he would never approve of again? Can’t drain the swamp when you keep overflowing it with more taxpayer funds. Selecting George W. Bush “Patriot” Act era deep-state judges as supreme court nominees doesn’t help either.
Others have written about Kavanaugh’s poor record on Constitutional rights and I really can’t improve on the reasoning that is provided by Brittany Hunter of the Foundation for Economic Education in her article “The Constitutional Reasons to Oppose Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court“. These few observations are reason enough to reject Kavanaugh as a supreme court justice nominee for me. These are very basic, obvious failures to side with the people and our inalienable rights and instead embrace a federal overlord. A vote for Kavanaugh is a vote for more of the same unconstitutional tyranny.
But the bigger question should be: why aren’t the Democrats using any of this instead of their Blasey-Ford, destined-to-fail, 1980’s high school party accusations? Have you heard any Republicans running for office discuss Kavanaugh’s judicial record on these issues – or is it all R vs. D blather (business as usual)? Do you really believe they are all that stupid? Or just that they think you are that stupid and will fall for this ruse?
As commenter Kevin McElroy puts it (on the linked article):
“If you were cynical, you might draw the conclusion that this entire confirmation hearing’s focus on unprovable sexual assault from 35 years ago was a smokescreen to distract from Kavanaugh’s atrocious track record on civil liberties, the bill of rights and the intrusions of the state at home and abroad.
During the last election, several of you asked me to post a list of who the good candidates are. There are some candidate profiles already posted to this website, which provide information about the best choices for sheriff and county commissioners. Early voting starts today (Wednesday April 11th) and runs through April 26th. Election day is May 1st.
Please vote for Patrick England for Blount County Sheriff. I’ll give you two good reasons to vote for Patrick England.
1. Patrick has a plan to improve response time, when you call the sheriff’s office. Response times can be slow to some areas of the county. Patrick has studied the situation closely and will implement some much needed changes to have officers at your home or businesses quicker when you need them.
2. Patrick opposes jail expansion. He realizes that the overcrowding problem is largely due to the housing of discretionary inmates in the jail. There are state felons and pretrial federal inmates that do not have to be housed in the local jail. He does not think it is necessary to put Blount County further in debt to house inmates that the county does not have to house.
There are numerous reason not to vote for 28 year incumbent James Lee Berrong. He appears to have acted without authority when he signed the federal inmates contract without seeking commission approval.
Berrong has a history of threatening to burn peoples’ houses down. This is documented in a court opinion. Please read more here: If someone threatened to shave your dog, sugar your gas tank and burn your house down would you report them to the sheriff or vote for them for sheriff?
Berrong has gone unopposed for several terms. This is our chance to drain the swamp of Blount County government.
Let freedom ring!
Americans have been conditioned to call 911 or the police when fearing for loss of life, liberty or property. Many accept this as being what they’re suppose to do, but who do you call when the person threatening your life, property or liberty is the sheriff?
A 2014 court opinion from the Tennessee Supreme Court Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel at Knoxville, stemming from a meeting in 2002 between Blount County Sheriff James Lee Berrong and his former secretary Jo Dean Nuchols, refers to a disturbing, habitual problem from Berrong. From page 4:
“Sheriff Berrong, Chief Crisp and Mr. French testified that at the meeting, the Sheriff was upset because he believed Ms. Nuchols had gossiped to his wife about alleged improprieties. All testified that the Sheriff’s actual words were that he would ‘shave her dog, sugar her gas tank and burn her house down.’ Chief Crisp and Mr. French stated that this was a phrase the Sheriff used frequently. Two other witnesses, Martha Reagan and Dennis Garner, also confirmed that the Sheriff often used that phrase.”
Threats to shave someone’s dog, sugar their gas tank and burn their home down should not be tolerated from anyone, let alone the chief law enforcement officer for Blount County. Anyone often making such a threatening statement is wholly unfit to hold public office.
Ms. Nuchols’ workers compensation case was dismissed because of a failure to provide notice, not because her claim was frivolous. From page 18:
“In its alternative findings, the trial court held that Ms. Nuchols had a claim for 100% total disability. Unfortunately for Ms. Nuchols, she failed to perfect her claim by providing the defendants notice until she filed her claim almost a year later.”
This matter appears to originate from the sheriff’s concern about Nuchols talking with his wife. From page 2:
“It is not disputed that Sheriff Berrong believed that Ms. Nuchols had a telephone conversation with his wife, Gayle, on May 29, during which Ms. Nuchols implied that he had been involved in an inappropriate relationship with a female employee of the department.”
The female employee is identified as Kathy on page 3 but no last name is included. Did the sheriff have an inappropriate relationship with a female employee named Kathy? The citizens of Blount County deserve to know.
Berrong’s website talks about his aggressive approach to drug enforcement and sex offenders. Perhaps Berrong should apply an aggressive approach toward improving his own behavior. Shouldn’t a sheriff lead by example?
It’s time for a new sheriff in town. The election on May 1, 2018 is the day to make that happen.
Commissioners Gary Farmer, Kenneth Melton and Steve Samples were absent.
Last month, the commission approved a contract for architectural services with Michael Brady Incorporated (MBI) without also approving a budget amendment to pay for the contract. This month the commission approved the funding for the contract with the architectural firm as well as funding for public relations and a project manager.
Yes, Blount County government thinks that it needs a Ministry of Propaganda to tell you why they’ve hired an architect for the jail. Unless you’ve been living in the forest you know that Blount County, like any other county in this nation, has a drug problem stemming from the use of pain pills and street drugs. It’s really a shame that the taxpayers are having to pay to be told that there is an opioid and drug problem in the community.
The memo in the commission packet from the Blount County Purchasing Department, Human Resources and Finance Department says that the contract was approved by the Blount County Corrections Partnership (BCCP). However, it was not approved by the BCCP.
The last time that the BCCP met was in March to discuss the purchasing agent’s selection of MBI. The agenda for the meeting says, “Discussion and possible action regarding presentation regarding the solicitation and request for qualifications for architectural planning and/or design services and/or programming services for Blount County.” There is no mention of a contract in the agenda or the unofficial meeting minutes of this BCCP meeting. The minutes are unofficial because the BCCP has not met since this March 28, 2017 meeting and therefore has not taken any vote to approve the meeting minutes.
The contract with MBI is time stamped on the bottom with a date of May 24, 2017, which is almost two months after the BCCP March 28 meeting. Why would the purchasing agent, human resources director and director of accounts and budgets (finance director) sign a memo with a false statement? Why would their boss Mayor Ed Mitchell let them?
The cost to the taxpayers is $244,723 which includes $188,000 for the MBI contract. Only Commissioners Mike Akard, Jamie Daly, Karen Miller and I (Tona Monroe) voted against this.
The resolution says that the monies came from funds “Assigned for Public Safety.” Many remember when I found that Sheriff James Lee Berrong and Mayor Ed Mitchell had a $2 million jail plan in Tennessee Corrections Institute Board of Control meeting minutes. The commission is the body who has the authority to express the county’s intent by assigning monies in the general fund. The Tennessee Comptroller’s Office did not recognize the assignments of $2 million for public safety.
The bigger and potentially more expensive picture is that “Blount County has not set a specific scope or budget for this project,” as stated under Article 1.12 of the MBI contract.
Grant process dysfunctional
The commission was asked to approve five grants. The deadline for two of these grants, one for juvenile court and the other for the animal shelter, had already passed. While these two grants had already been written, neither provided the commission with copies of the actual grants. The juvenile court grant worksheet included a memo about the grant while the animal shelter only provided the grant worksheet. It seems reasonable that any department/office wanting the commission to approve a grant after the deadline would include a copy of the grant along with the worksheet.
The commission approved a $360,791 increase to the state aid account of the highway department budget. According to a memo from Highway Superintendent Jeff Headrick, Tennessee Department of Transport (TDOT) provided the funds for replacement of tiles/culverts on state highways. The state aid account is now $1,082,000 for fiscal year 2018.
The commission approved TDOT’s proposal for the relocated Alcoa Highway. While there was a public meeting in the City of Alcoa about this proposal in May, this was the first time that this commission was provided anything on the proposal. It would have been nice to have been given more time to study the matter and to hear from the citizens on something this important. Most seemed to be unaware that the commission was considering this matter. I voted against this because of the short time frame to study the matter and because of the lack of information about other possibilities for Alcoa Highway. Commissioners Jamie Daly and Karen Miller also voted no while the rest of the commissioners present voted yes.
A meeting was called to approve applying for federal funds to make improvements to Morganton Road. This road has long been in need of repair. People in the 1st, 6th and 7th districts have expressed their concerns about the road to me. This has been one of the top 10 issues that I hear the most about from those in the community.
This a good start but more work is needed. Some are upset that this project does not come further into the county. There have been concerns expressed about the City of Maryville annexing part of Morganton Road.
According to the mayor, the commission approved $4 million for improvements to Morganton Road in 2006 but those funds were never spent for that purpose. No one that I’ve spoken with seems to know why this money was never spent.
This project runs into 2023. You can read more about it here.
Accounting and financial software
The commission approved a 7 year, $2.334M contract for a Financial Management Information System (FMIS). This Services as a Software (SaaS) agreement is with Tyler Technologies. The estimated cost for implementation is $293,470.50 and the annual recurring fees are $299,945.00 throughout the 7 year contract.
When the Kronos time keeping, payroll and HR software system was presented to the commission, a business case was made for savings through staff reductions. Those projected savings never materialized. According to a June 22, 2017 email from Finance Director Randy Vineyard, “there have been no retirements or departures since implementation in General County.” He did write that there could be possible staff reductions in the future as “as staff retirements arise.”
No business case for savings was made for the purchase of Tyler Technologies software. The commission was told that the current financial system was antiquated, unsecure, needed to be replaced with a modern system and that Tyler Technologies is the best fit for the county. The commission not given anything to support the assertion that this company’s software is the best fit for Blount County.
The commission is often asked to vote on what the bureaucrats want without being given any information on comparable products. With an annual reoccurring expense of nearly $300K, it would have been helpful to have seen what other companies had to offer. Other companies might offer a bit less than a competitor but at a much lower price while still providing what the county needs. I don’t know if there were any better deals or fits for the county because I wasn’t given any information on any other products.
The memo to the commission is from the county’s program manager for IT Abhijit Verekar of Avèro Advisors. He is being sued in federal court by a previous employer.
Considering the lack of information about comparable products, I thought it best to vote no to this long term costly commitment. Commissioners Mike Akard, Jamie Daly and Karen Miller also voted no.
Up next: The end of August marks the end of the 3rd year of this four year commission term. What would you like to see me focus on during the next year?
It’s also time to give serious consideration to running for local office. In November, candidates can begin picking up petitions to run in the May 1, 2018 primary election. That will be here before you know it. Don’t let the opportunity slip past you.
In the words of a great American:
“We are not weak, if we make proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power… The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.” Patrick Henry
Even if you don’t want to run, you can begin talking to others about running and support good candidates who do run.
“Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.” — Edmund Burke
Information Technology (IT) Committee meeting
The IT Committee heard from Abhijit Verekar (AV) on the status of Blount County’s ongoing IT project updates. AV has served as the project manger for the multiyear IT project. However, this time he was the project manager from his own newly started company Avero Advisors, rather than Mindboard Inc (Mindboard). If you’re thinking this seems odd, you may be right.
AV and Mindboard Inc. were embroiled in a lawsuit with AV’s previous employer RNR Consulting when the county commission approved a contract with Mindboard Inc. Some serious allegations were made in that lawsuit. If you aren’t familiar with the situation please click on these links and read about the matter before proceeding with the rest of this report.
New company not brought to the commission for approval
Only one of the references listed in response to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) provided by Mindboard had a budget over $60,000 while the county’s IT budget was more than 22 times that amount. It didn’t make good sense to hire Mindboard because of these serious allegations and too much uncertainty about Mindboard handling such a large budget.
Purchasing Agent Katie Branham-Kerr defended her choice in early 2016 by saying that the rates that Mindboard offered the county were 20% lower than other contract rates but nothing was provided to the commission to support this statement. When I (Commissioner Tona Monroe) asked Branham-Kerr why the county was switching from Mindboard to Avero Advisors, she said the county would save about 30% from what it was paying Mindboard. It makes one wonder why Mindboard was chosen when she could find another firm to do the work cheaper the following year. The county’s purchasing process leaves much to be desired.
The county hasn’t actually terminated its contract with Mindboard. Both Mindboard. and AV’s company Avero Advisors are providing IT services to Blount County government. The contract with Avero is set up on a yearly basis, renewing annually at the start of each fiscal year. The arrangement means that the Avero contract doesn’t have to be brought to the commission for a vote on the matter because it doesn’t extend beyond the current fiscal year. However, a contract that annually renews automatically, unless being canceled, should be required to be approved by the county commission. This is a reform needed at the state level.
I asked Branham-Kerr if AV was working for both companies and she said no. She said that the county had received a signed agreement from Mindboard Inc., releasing AV from contract with Mindboard. You can read the Change of Relationship Agreement here.
Under Terms and Conditions it says:
“1. Contract Termination.
The parties hereby agree that the Agreement has been and is hereby terminated in all respects, provided however that the provisions of Sections 5 shall survive with the exception that Employee is permitted to contract with Blount County, TN and Mindboard will not seek to enforce Section 5 with respect to Employee contracting with Blount County, TN.”
Section 5 is not stated in the agreement but it appears to refer to a non-compete clause in the terminated employment contract between Mindboard and AV. Thus, it appears that Mindboard allowed AV to contract with Blount County but not any other customer that Mindboard may have. If so, why?
Despite this large sum of money, people are expressing their dissatisfaction with the county’s new website and software system used for commission and committee meetings. The new Granicus program isn’t as user friendly as the older, simpler system.
The IT Committee had no say in the selection of the new software system or website. I have and continue to wonder why there is even an IT Committee since the Mayor’s Office along with the purchasing agent and these IT firms are making the decisions how to spend your money.
Over $3 million has been budgeted in recent years for Mayor Ed Mitchell, Mindboard Inc. and Avero Advisors to manage. It is really a shame that there is so much dissatisfaction with the use of millions of your tax dollars.
Commissioners Mike Akard and Steve Samples were absent. Once again, I was prohibited from asking questions at the monthly commission meeting.
Recycling convenience center – Failed leadership of Mayor Ed Mitchell
There is perhaps no greater example of the failure of Mayor Ed Mitchell’s leadership than with the way he has handled recycling in Blount County. For those who are cheering the opening of a convenience center in the county, I encourage you to consider the history of recycling in Blount County because we now have less recycling sites with the county providing recycling than before the county decided to provide recycling.
Spectra recycling announced that in May it would be closing its recycling location on Robert C Jackson that was open to the public. After learning about this, I called the owner Mr. Steve Dixon. He told me that I was the only elected official to call him to find out why he had closed the recycling convenience center. After I shared this with the Big Springs Community Club at its monthly meeting, the other commissioner from the 7th district went and met with Mr. Dixon after he had already voted to spend taxpayer money for a convenience center.
Mr. Dixon shared with me how previous mayors had met with him and were appreciative of his free recycling services that he provided to the citizens of Blount County. He shared that this changed with the Mitchell administration and the new Purchasing Agent Katie Branham-Kerr.
In 2015, the Purchasing Department issued Request for Proposal (RFP) 2015-2372 to provide recycling services for county buildings. Spectra had been providing free recycling to the county government, in addition to free recycling convenience centers throughout the county. Spectra was the only one to bid that RFP.
Spectra had provided free recycling to the county government up to that point but the recycling market is dynamic and hadn’t been profitable; therefore, it had asked for a small trip fee to cover expenses. The cost would have been a few thousand dollars annually.
Then Purchasing Agent Theresa Johnson, who was later demoted to assistant purchasing agent, told Mr. Dixon that she would have to take the matter to Mayor Ed Mitchell. Mr. Dixon waited about a year thinking that Spectra would be awarded a contract but when he called the new Purchasing Agent Katie Branham-Kerr he was told that the county would not been awarding a contract for RFP 2015-2372. During this year Spectra continued providing free recycling services to the county government.
When I tried to inquire why this RFP was not awarded, Commissioner Ron French declared a point of order saying that it was 2017 not 2015 and Chairman Jerome Moon declared me out of order. This prohibited me from making the point that perhaps this matter had something to do with why Spectra was no longer offering recycling and inquiring why Spectra didn’t respond to the current RFP 2016-2456 (issued in 2017). The 2017 RFP only had 2 responses. Commissioners looking out for the taxpayers should want to know why Spectra, a local business, did not respond to a recycling RFP.
Mr. Dixon shared with me that he did not know that a new RFP had been issued. This is alarming because I reviewed the 2015 RFP and found that the county reached out to potential bidders but did not appear to make the same effort with the 2017 RFP. I asked the purchasing agent who the county reached out to on the 2017 RFP and received this response:
From: “Katie Branham-Kerr” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 4:24pm
Cc: “Jackie Cooper” <email@example.com>
Subject: Fwd: Question about Recycling
From: Lauri Bell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: Question about Recycling
To: Katie Branham-Kerr <email@example.com>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Katie Branham-Kerr <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Please review Mrs. Monroe’s email and let me know who we reached out to individually regarding the recycling bid.———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Question about Recycling
To: Katie Branham-Kerr <email@example.com>
Dear Katie,In reviewing the recycling records, the purchasing office reached out to potential bidders, by email, in 2015 for recycling needs. There wasn’t any record of that occurring this year. Did your office reach out, by email or any other form of communication, to potential companies that might provide recycling services?Also, I received 3 records from Jackie but didn’t receive the email that I asked be forwarded related to the hourly rates that you negotiated with AV. Please forward that email to me.Sincerely,
I have repeatedly asked the purchasing agent and Mayor’s Office why the 2015 recycling RFP was not awarded. No explanation has been given.
At one time, Spectra was providing 12 free recycling sites throughout Blount County, not including the schools that it was providing free recycling services for. Some of these recycling centers were open to the public 24/7/365. The county’s convenience center will only be open 3 days a week. Furthermore, recycling at the library will stop as well.
At one time Spectra was providing free recycling for the county at the location on McArthur Road where the new convenience center will be located. Now the taxpayers will pay for part time recycling at this location and the 12 free recycling centers that the county once had are gone. After speaking with Mr. Dixon at Spectra, I am firmly convinced that the county could have many more recycling centers throughout the county with more hours of operation for less money than the 3 day a week county operation that will be at McArthur Road. This great loss to the community falls squarely on the shoulders of Mayor Ed Mitchell. Blount County needs a mayor with private sector experience who can get things done without going to taxpayers for everything.
To make matters worse, the commission wasn’t provided with all the documentation pertaining to the contract. The contract instrument says that the contract consists of 7 documents including: the Request for Proposal, the Instructions to Proponents, the Contractor’s Proposal, the General Specifications, the resolution of Blount County ordering or authorizing, the work and services contemplated herein, this instrument and any addenda or changes to the foregoing documents agreed to by the parties hereto. The commission was only provided with the instrument and the authorizing resolution. It’s possible that there were no amendments but the commission should have been told that no amendments exists if there were none.
I moved to postpone the matter until the next month so that the commission could be provided with all of the documentation. The motion failed with only Commissioners Archie Archer, Shawn Carter, Jamie Daly, Karen Miller and I voting to wait one month to be given all of the documentation prior to voting on the matter. The commissioners who sponsored the resolution approving the contract have egg on their faces. You should watch the commission meeting to see how some of them try defending why they brought a contract to the commission without having the entirety of the contract. The purchasing agent said that the reason that some of the documents were not provided is because they weren’t yet finished. However, that does not explain the failure to provide the RFP to the commission.
Commissioner Mike Caylor asked the mayor if he had done his due diligence on this matter. Mitchell said he had. Apparently Caylor was OK with not doing his due diligence as a county commissioner, to protect the taxpayers.
Most of the commissioners present took the Nancy Pelosi approach to government when they voted for something only to learn later what is in it. Only Commissioners Jamie Daly, Karen Miller and I voted against approving a contract without having all of the documents available.
Jail architect contract approved without a budget amendment – discussion process seriously flawed
The commission approved a contract with Michael Brady Incorporated (MBI) for jail expansion/renovation (?) without knowing the full costs of what is being called the Criminal Justice Initiative (CJI). Jerome Moon and the commissioners who follow his lead made hypocrites out of themselves with this issue because there was no budget amendment in the packet to pay for the contract. Moon has insisted in the past that the commission appropriate money to pay for something prior to discuss what the money is actually being appropriated for. Remember when I tried to move discussion of the budget ahead of setting the tax rate in 2015 and only the three women commissioners voted to discuss the budget first?
On this same agenda the commission voted to appropriate the money for the recycling contract before voting on the actual contract, which was not provided in its entirety. Moon didn’t even want me discussing the recycling contract during the discussion time of the budget amendment that funded it. The commission is expected to approve the money without first discussing the substance of the matter, the actual legal documents and impact those documents will have. Doesn’t it make sense to discuss the substance of the matter before you spend the money to do it? The discussion process is seriously flawed.
Commissioner Andy Allen pointed out that the contract was specific in the cost for this project. It’s true that the cost of the architectural firm is in the contract. However, the costs of the project are more than the MBI contract. The commissioners weren’t told what the actual total costs of the CJI project would be. Only commissioners Jamie Daly, Karen Miller and I voted against approving the contract.
Not satisfied due to the lack of information provided, I wrote Director of Accounts and Budgets Randy Vineyard for an explanation of the costs. It turns out that he didn’t know either and wrote that due diligence for the CJI was not finished when the contract was presented to the commission.
From: “Randy Vineyard” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:05am
Cc: “Marvin Mitchell” <email@example.com>, “James Berrong” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Jarrod Millsaps” <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Funding for MBI contract
The amendment has not been finalized because there are items likely to be recommended along with the MBI fees. Our due diligence is not yet completed.
Randy Vineyard, IOM
Blount County Finance Director“
Support for the federal government’s war on poverty
The commission approved a resolution supporting federal government programs that were created as a part of the war on poverty. Nearly everything that the federal government declares war on turns into an expensive failure. The war on poverty may be the costliest “war” disaster of all.
All 21 Blount County Commissioners were elected and are in office as Republicans. Only Commissioner Karen Miller and I voted against this, showing that most Republicans aren’t serious about cutting wasteful spending or eliminating failed government programs. Furthermore, most of the commissioners do not seem to honor their oaths of office because there is no authority for the federal government’s war of poverty authorized in the United States Constitution.
Federal COPS grant approved after deadline
The commission was presented with a USDOJ Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) grant application after the grant deadline had already passed. The grant will pay for 75% of the salaries and benefits for 6 officers for 3 years. The grant does not pay for equipping the officers with laptops, uniforms, weapons, or cars. The commission was told that the county would be required to keep these positions, after the grant money runs out.
Commissioner Caylor seemed indigent that Commissioner Daly would even inquire about the county having to pay for the officers after the grant money ran out. He said it was a savings but there is no savings. Federal money is taxpayer money. At the rate that the federal government is borrowing money, your children and grandchildren may be forced to pay interest to foreign investors in China and Saudi Arabia on these officers because the federal government is not paying its (our) bills now.
While the program goal and objectives were including in the grant application guide, the commission was provided no data to show that six more officers will actually improve safety in the community. Only commissioners Daly, Miller and I voted no this grant.
July was a doozie. The lackadaisical attitude of several on the commission should give pause to those concerned about their community. If you want to see better government, then seriously considering becoming that better government by either running for local office or supporting good candidates who will ensure that due diligence is done prior to each vote of the commission.
Blount County Commissioner Tona Monroe was a guest speaker on Speaking Freely on 92.3 FM this evening. She discussed her recent nomination of Scott Williams to replace Doug Overbey in the state senate, her political philosophy, the secrecy in purchasing that occurred with a state law passed last year and scamera and speeding tickets.
Nervous about traffic stops? John Whitehead of The Rutherford Institute is and says you should be too.
By Ron Paul
The Senate Intelligence Committee recently passed its Intelligence Authorization Act for 2018 that contains a chilling attack on the First Amendment. Section 623 of the act expresses the “sense of Congress” that WikiLeaks resembles a “non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such.” This language is designed to delegitimize WikiLeaks, encourage the federal government to spy on individuals working with WikiLeaks, and block access to WikiLeaks’ website. This provision could even justify sending US forces abroad to arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange or other WikiLeaks personnel.
WikiLeaks critics claim that the organization’s leaks harm US national security. However, these critics are unable to provide a single specific example of WikiLeaks’ actions harming the American people. WikiLeaks does harm the reputations of government agencies and politicians, however. For example, earlier this year WikiLeaks released information on the CIA’s hacking program. The leaks did not reveal any details on operations against foreign targets, but they did let the American people know how easy it is for the government to hack into their electronic devices.
For the last year, most of the news surrounding WikiLeaks has centered on its leak of emails showing how prominent Democrats worked to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign. In order to deflect attention from these revelations, Democrats, aided by their allies in the media and even some Republicans, promulgated a conspiracy theory blaming the leaks on Russian hackers working to defeat Hillary Clinton. Even though there is no evidence the Russians were behind the leaks, many in both parties are still peddling the “Putin did it” narrative. This aids an effort by the deep state and its allies in Congress and the media to delegitimize last year’s election, advance a new Cold War with Russia, and criminalize WikiLeaks.
If the government is successful in shutting down WikiLeaks by labeling it a “hostile intelligence service,” it will use this tactic to silence other organizations and websites as well. The goal will be to create a climate of fear to ensure no one dares publish the revelations of a future Edward Snowden or Chelsea Manning.
Some have suggested that criticizing police brutality, the surveillance state, the Federal Reserve, or even federal spending aids “hostile foreign powers” by weakening the people’s “trust in government.” This line of reasoning could be used to silence, in the name of “national security,” websites critical of the welfare-warfare state.
By labeling WikiLeaks a “hostile intelligence service” and thus legitimizing government action against the organization, the Senate Intelligence Authorization Act threatens the ability of whistleblowers to inform the public about government misdeeds. It also sets a precedent that could be used to limit other types of free speech.
President Trump should make it clear he will veto any bill giving government new powers to silence organizations like WikiLeaks. If President Trump supports the war on WikiLeaks, after candidate Trump proclaimed his love for WikiLeaks, it will be further proof that he has outsourced his presidency to the deep state.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, along with notable whistleblowers, foreign policy experts, and leading champions of peace and liberty, will be addressing this important issue at my Institute for Peace and Prosperity’s conference on Saturday, September 9 at the Dulles Airport Marriott Hotel in Dulles, Virginia outside of Washington, D.C. You can get more information about the conference and purchase tickets at the Ron Paul Institute.