Stinnett responds to Hutchens letter by showing up at his house: Response is symptom of deeper problems

Richard Hutchens sent an open letter to the Mayor and Blount County Commissioners in the evening on November 9th.  Commissioner Tom Stinnett was waiting for Richard Hutchens at his duplex the next day when he arrived home from work.  Stinnett told Hutchens that he had researched the first issue that Hutchens addressed in his letter, gave his card to Hutchens and told Hutchens he would appreciate it if he would call him directly in the future to discuss issues.

Stinnett told Hutchens not to rely on hearsay, referring to the Stinnett quotes in Hutchens’ letter.  Hutchens informed Stinnett that the quotes were not hearsay and that there is a recording of Stinnett’s conversation with Grady Caskey.  Blount County (BC) Public Record is in possession of a recording where Tom Stinnett says both of the quotes that Hutchens included in his letter.  The person who overheard the conversation also recorded it.  BC Public Record respects the anonymity of it’s sources and has confirmed that Commissioner Tom Stinnett did make both of those statements to Commissioner Grady Caskey.

As alarming as Tom Stinnett’s statements are, it touches upon the need to address two important issues affecting the taxpayers of Blount County.  The first is the makeup of the Human Resources (HR) Committee.  9 of the 10 members are either County employees or City of Maryville employees.  Only one member, Commissioner Mike Lewis, does not work for a government within Blount County.  Lewis also had a conflict of interest in the past, having worked for a Bank that had business dealings with the County.  His previous employment was the subject of an Attorney General opinion.  The makeup of the HR Committee only makes sense if you work for government.  The HR Committee makes important decisions regarding benefits for County employees.  The current makeup allows for foxes to guard the hen house, which leads to the second important issue affecting taxpayers.

County employees currently receive employee health care benefits for $25 a month.  This is the lowest cost that I know of anywhere right now.  Businesses are not providing premium plans at such low costs anymore.  Furthermore, what the employees receive for their $25 a month is routinely referred to as a “rich” plan by the County broker, Trinity Benefits Advisors.

School employees received their plan for free until August 1st.  I asked Troy Logan to explain the matter to me and received this response:

“As of August 1, 2014, all School employees with health insurance coverage are paying $25 per month out-of-pocket.  And yes, the BOE did reimburse all School employees with health insurance coverage $25 per month from January 1, 2014 – July 31, 2014.  For teachers, this was based on an agreement through the collaborative conferencing process.  For non-teachers, the BOE agreed to “effect” them in the same manner as teachers.  For all employees, this benefit stopped July 31, 2014.  Let me know if you need additional information.”

The free coverage is what led to the conversation between Commissioners Tom Stinnett and Grady Caskey.  Sheriff James Berrong heard that School employees were paying nothing for their rich coverage and said he wanted to look further into this at the July HR meeting.  Caskey was not on the Commission in July, but addressed the Sheriff’s remarks at the October HR meeting.  After the meeting, Stinnett admonished Caskey for talking about the matter in public.  You can read his alarming remarks in my monthly October Commission report.

The conversation between Commissioners Stinnett and Caskey leaves me wondering if there’s an effort afoot to eliminate the $25 cost for health insurance coverage.  At the end of the October HR meeting, Sheriff James Berrong and Highway Superintendent Bill Dunlap commented about employee health care coverage costs.  Berrong responded to Caskey by saying, “I was the one that brought up the difference (referring to School employees being reimbursed the $25 monthly cost)… my purpose of that… I was going to make a motion to rescind General County having to pay the $25 when Education didn’t and that was my purpose for that.”   Dunlap said, “That Uniform Road law gives me the right to set the salaries for all the employees of the Highway Department.  This coming Budget year, I will adjust that.”  Dunlap was referring to the health insurance premiums.

Perhaps Tom Stinnett’s request for secrecy will have the opposite effect and finally shed some light on a huge problem.  The last figures that I saw showed health benefits costing approximately $900 per month per employee.  What do you think are reasonable costs for County employee health and dental benefit premiums?

3 thoughts on “Stinnett responds to Hutchens letter by showing up at his house: Response is symptom of deeper problems

  1. They oughtta have to pay similar health ins premiums as the rest of us do. My property tax revenues should not go to pay city/county employees health insurance. They should pay for it out of their wages, like I do. If they don’t have a job, like so many ppl, then they can go on the exchange and get a plan-even tho I would be subsidizing that too, at least they would be paying more for their own insurance, LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE IS FORCED TO DO.

  2. Pretty common for employees to pay 30% of their premiums with the employer paying 70%. Also not unusual to get a choice between high deductible/HSA and PPO/HMO style plans with the paid benefit to the employee about the same. If you want the Cadillac plan with $15 office visits, you pay more. Some employers are moving to a fixed benefit amount per employee regardless of their family status. You get $400 a month and go buy whatever you are willing to supplement to pay for. I have found that is the best route. These brokered “group” employee plans are a real rip-off for people in good health. You could be getting an employee benefit of “$1200/month” for a plan you could buy yourself from TRH for $350. Both you and the company lose. I have found dental and vision insurance to be about the same coming from an employer or buying yourself no matter how you slice it.

    I don’t think county employees are as stupid as Kathleen Sebelius does. I think they will do a good job being thrifty if they have to do the shopping and take ownership of their benefits.

  3. According to the State Department of Education, Blount County’s medical insurance for teachers is the best in the state. In my opinion, too large of a percentage of the county’s revenue is going to the schools. The number of students in the system stays about even, but the amount of money is increasing every year. It is way past time to seriously take a hard look at this cash cow known as education.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *