Archives

BLM and Proud Boys – funded by same operation?

by Horatio Bunce

https://gab.com/RobertPatrickLewis/posts/106220334464682072

“Until the FBI explains why BLM subversive John Sullivan, who video shows was (sic) the only armed member of ThE iNsUrReCtIoN, was released from their custody in <12hrs, assume that he was their asset and January 6th was their operation.

Prove me wrong.

Please.”

 

If you aren’t familiar with John Sullivan, he was active within BLM in Utah and Oregon and was identified by the western “antifa” ranks as an agent provocateur. He has past ties to FBI. His is the video referred to here, showing the “capitol police officer” (or at least his cuff-link and bejeweled wrist) allegedly shooting unarmed military psyop division veteran  “Ashli Babbit” and the aftermath of fakery, destruction of the murder scene evidence by “trained professionals”, etc.

Take a look as even eyewitnesses there that day call them out as “actors”:

If John Sullivan, the Agitator at the Capitol, Is Not BLM/ Antifa, Who Does He Work For?

According to the article linked above, his brother James, “is a pro-Trump activist who helped organize the January 6 “Stop the Steal” rally in Washington, DC.  James is affiliated with the Proud Boys”. James Sullivan called for Black/ minority Republicans to confront Antifa at the city’s Black Lives Matter Plaza on January 6, which could have led to violence.  James Sullivan is the founder of the Utah-based ‘Civilized Awakening’ group that supports Trump’s agenda and is a sharp critic of Black Lives Matter.”

Gee, what are the odds his brother was organizing the “other” side?

“Raw footage filmed by [John] Sullivan inside the Capitol and published on his [John’s] personal YouTube channel shows him [John] in rapport with Trump supporters, even offering them his knife to get through a locked door. He urged the crowd to commit acts of violence.”

So by January 6th, John had moved from Antifa/BLM agent provocateur to Trump Rally provocateur – but he had prior experience playing both sides in the fake war:

“[John] Sullivan currently is in trouble in Provo, Utah, his hometown, where he is facing charges for inciting a riot and criminal mischief in July 2020 in a protest against police. He is accused of kicking vehicles, threatening motorists, and urging protesters to block traffic. A female driving an SUV was stopped by the protesters and shot by one of his associates. Blumenthal says the incident led to the formation of the Utah Citizen’s Militia and galvanized right-wing forces across the state. Days later, John organized a rally and armed militia members counter-protested across the street. John invited several members of the Proud Boys and militia activists to address his crowd, and has had other contact with the Proud Boys. Very strange behavior, indeed.

Conveniently: “Their father is a retired Army Lt. Col. whose name has been withheld at the request of several acquaintances of the family.

Folks need to wake up to the fact that the US Government alphabet agencies are embedded and acting as provocateurs in both left (antifa) and right (proud boys) organizations. Their coordinated false flags will continue to be used to erode liberty and employ even greater unconstitutional government controls.

Tennessee Republican Super-majority in Senate Judiciary Committee Refuse to Repeal Unconstitutional Law

by Horatio Bunce

One of my arguments regarding Tennessee law and upholding our constitutions, that is, to stop infringing upon the rights enumerated in our state and federal constitutions with current unconstitutional legislation in place, is that the legislation required to do this is quite simple. We do not need additional, new “laws” to codify these rights (such as Bill Lee’s Fake Constitutional Carry legislation which is not constitutional). Many issues can be corrected by simply repealing the existing unconstitutional (and therefore illegal) state laws on the books. This particularly applies in regards to the unconstitutional “law” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1307 which states that:

(a)

(1) A person commits an offense who carries, with the intent to go armed, a firearm or a club.

(2)

(A) The first violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class C misdemeanor, and, in addition to possible imprisonment as provided by law, may be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500).
(B) A second or subsequent violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class B misdemeanor.
(C) A violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor if the person’s carrying of a handgun occurred at a place open to the public where one (1) or more persons were present.

Of course, this “law” is a blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – and in fact is in conflict with other existing unconstitutional “permit” law, such as Bill Lee’s Fake Constitutional Carry. How exactly does one carry a firearm (or club), even with a Fake Constitutional Carry permit, and not “go armed”? This is shoddy legal work, missing definitions and intentionally ambiguous such that I suppose any “law enforcement” officer or judge can decide for themselves what your “intent” is in keeping and bearing your arms. It makes a misdemeanor criminal of any and every person carrying a handgun in public where one or more persons is present. Well duh, it takes at least one person to carry the weapon. Really brilliant “law” work here. The state of Tennessee is currently in the criminal position of depriving residents of  Constitutional rights with this “law”.

There was a bill in current legislative session, SB1391, sponsored by Sen. Janice Bowling that would repeal this unconstitutional “law” while leaving the other provisions within the section prohibiting firearm possession by convicted felons, etc. I.e., it would remove the unconstitutional portion infringing on the right to keep and bear arms and stop criminalizing the act of non-felons exercising a constitutional right. This is actually REQUIRED by the U.S. Constitution and those taking oaths to defend the Constitution, uphold it, etc. should be pursuing this sort of action.

So, what did the 7-1 Republican Super-majority Senate Judicial Committee do with the bill? Not a damn thing. They wouldn’t even make a motion to discuss it. Here are the parties involved:

Mike Bell (R), Dawn White (R), Paul Rose (R),  Todd Gardenhire (R), Sara Kyle (D), Jon Lundberg (R), Kerry Roberts (R), John Stevens (R).  Katrina Robinson (D) was not present, so the Republicans enjoyed a 7-1 majority and wouldn’t move on restoring constitutional rights.

 

Link to video here:http://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=610&clip_id=24634&meta_id=591892

 

Mike Bell does some tap dancing at the end to explain that somehow there was a mix-up on an amendment that was pulled right before noon, so the OIG office was told to not bother testifying on this bill and now they would want to, blah, blah, blah. What difference does it make? IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS CRIMINAL FOR THIS GOVERNMENT TO KEEP DOING IT. IT SHOULD BE REPEALED. Who cares what the OIG says? Besides, if you will pay close attention to the first of the video, Janice states that drafting code 4096 amendment makes the bill. There are no Senate amendments listed for this bill. So is there an amendment or not? Since the General Assembly website still shows ZERO amendments on the Senate bill, is there zero, one (as declared by Bowling) or two (as implied by Bell)? Once again, Tennesseans are kept in the dark about legislators’ backroom discussions, side deals, required amendments to “get your bill through”, dog and pony show testimonials from various lobbyists against the people, etc. such as the Tennessee Sheriff’s Association. Many times we cannot even see the amendments that are being read and debated live by committees. Those who have attempted to track the sausage-making in Nashville are familiar with how impossible it is at times to even be informed on legislation before it is voted upon – let alone contact the legislators about to vote on your behalf. This bill, however, is quite simple. There should be no deals required. Republicans not making a motion on this bill feigning wanting to give a state agency with financial conflict of interest to keep infringing on constitutional rights is no excuse.

Tennessee Republicans have enjoyed a supermajority for over TEN YEARS with no impediments to these types of corrections EXCEPT FOR REPUBLICANS. They cannot blame the Democratic party. The fault lies with the Republicans. Also note that the typical “fiscal note” was attached to this bill declaring that the state would lose millions of dollars if they cannot continue to infringe on constitutional rights of law-abiding, non-felon gun owners.  These criminal protection racket fiscal notes are continually attached to bills seeking to restore 2nd amendment rights to Tennesseans. It is just too expensive for government to let go of their criminal infringement taxes. This is nothing less than constitutional right-abridging theft by our state government and is not an excuse to continue unconstitutional infringements. State government has been controlled by a super-majority of Republicans for over 10 years now. How much of your life is left to keep waiting on them? It appears that all seven of these members might need to go.  At least they should make a show of a 4-3 split and keep playing the “we need to close our private political party primaries so the RINOs don’t keep getting elected by us” game. 

The Thing about Speeding: NMA E-Newsletter #627

By guest writer Eric Peters

The problem with speed limits is they’re arbitrary and presumptive.

A velocity maximum is decreed, and you are presumed a threat to others if you exceed it. Almost everyone understands this is silly—else almost everyone would not “speed” routinely. Most of us do not play Russian roulette, for instance, irrespective of any laws forbidding it, because we don’t need to be threatened with a ticket to refrain from putting a loaded gun to our heads.

Almost everyone understands that driving five, ten mph, or even faster than above whatever the speed limit is isn’t like that. That “breaking” the speed limit is like stepping on sidewalk cracks and not likely to break your momma’s back. It is why few feel shame or guilt when “caught” going faster than the speed limit. Indeed, the opposite is likely true. Drivers resent being extorted by the courts and insurance mafia over something we know caused no harm and was not likely to cause harm.

Interestingly, this defeats the supposed purpose of speed limits if the purpose isn’t to pretextually fleece motorists.

Ostensibly, speed limits are posted—gird yourself—for “our safety.” It is an almost mathematical axiom that the very last thing intended is the plain meaning of those two words when you hear those two words.

An altogether different meaning is intended, which can be demonstrated by pointing out how useless speed limits are as information about how fast or not it is safe to drive on any given road, especially an unfamiliar one.

This ought to be the purpose of speed limits—advisory rather than arbitrary. Suppose limits convey useful information about speed in relation to the road ahead instead of the set-deliberately-below-the-speed most people drive on that road. More might actually drive the advisory speed limit. Inevitably, most drivers ignore the posted limits and see them as easy pickings for on-the-go tax collection.

Part of the problem is vocabulary.

A speed limit sounds like some engineering threshold, like an engine’s RPM limit. Exceed the redline, and engine damage is probable because the engine’s mechanical limits have been exceeded.

Most people take care not to exceed the redline because they know it has objective informational value, and they’d better pay attention to it.

But a speed limit is nothing like that. It is a statutory limit—something illegal to exceed because it has been so decreed but not necessarily harmful in and of itself.

It is obviously not an objective threshold beyond which danger lies, which is why most people do speed, regardless of any statute. General contempt for speed limits is universal, which undermines “our safety.”

It is not because people “speed,” but because the correlation between the signage and conditions is so tenuous that most of us ignore the signs unless police are in the vicinity. While some drive too slowly relative to the speed, the rest of us are driving to make sure that traffic does not needlessly bunch up when it could be flowing much more smoothly. This sets up a bizarre and irritating dynamic.

The speed limit obeyers are often taking a kind of righteous delight in their rigid obedience, which in their minds justifies not yielding to the drivers exceeding the speed limit because they are breaking the law!  While the “speeders” understandably get exasperated by the “slowpoke” ahead who is preventing them from driving at a speed they know isn’t dangerous, even if statutorily unlawful.

If “our safety” rather than our money is desired, the gov, perhaps, should post speed advisories with no fines attached.

This would benefit drivers not familiar with a given road by giving them a sound ballpark idea about how fast they ought to enter an unfamiliar curve, for instance. They would be given heed for the sake of safety as opposed to fear of a fine.

Because we have speed limits, people tend to either completely ignore them—knowing they can likely take the curve up ahead at ten or even twenty MPH faster than the sign says is “safe” (even at the risk of a ticket) because they have been driving that road and taking that curve every day for the past ten years at ten or even twenty MPH faster than the sign says is “safe.”

If a driver is not familiar with the road and has not taken the curve up ahead every day for the past ten years, they see the sign that says twenty-five MPH and creates a road hazard by driving preposterously slow for the curve. The next time they take that road, they’ll probably ignore the sign, like almost everyone else.

Motorists then habituate a combination of contempt for the signage as well as mindless obedience of signage irrespective of conditions, and neither is of much service to the cause of “our safety.” The entire regime is as counterproductive and cynical as it is profitable.

This explains why probably speed limits as absolute won’t end anytime soon.

Eric Peters lives in Virginia and enjoys driving cars and motorcycles. In the past, Eric worked as a car journalist for many prominent mainstream media outlets. Currently, he focuses his time writing auto history books, reviewing cars, and blogging about cars+ for his website EricPetersAutos.com.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in this newsletter are those of the author.

Source: https://www.motorists.org/alerts/the-thing-about-speeding-nma-e-newsletter-627/

PCR test

https://lbry.tv/@Alin:7/Kary-Mullis-gives-his-thoughts-on-Dr.-Fauci:1

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/18/pcr-test-reliability.aspx

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus

https://humantruth.net/the-pcr-game/

Stop blaming the coronavirus!

Thought of the Day – Coronahoax school edition

by Horatio Bunce

How can the state of Tennessee continue with forced (compulsory) education laws, threatening parents with prison if they do not comply, and issue these Covid-19 disclaimers claiming they have no liability and call them a “swim at your own risk” arrangement? More like “Pay for the pool and the pool employees and jump in and swim or we’ll put you in prison. Not our fault if you drown.”

Is this clown trying to get assassinated?

by Horatio Bunce

Maybe he should stick to losing his lawsuits against dirt tracks. The hypocrisy of the tin-pot dictators know no bounds. It’s like a stupid contest…

 

You’ll get false positives almost half the time

by Horatio Bunce

 

WE know the PCR test is a piece of garbage that was never intended to be used for medical diagnosis of presence of a viral infection, and here is a Canadian public health official translating the facts. But don’t let the facts stop you CDC fear-porn mask-mandating dictators!

The “second wave” is way more than 50% fake though because of the ridiculous amount of “tests” being performed.  Test 100: 50 come back false positive. Test 5,000: 2,500 come back false positive. 2500>500 = Second Wave!  C’mon folks, we haven’t been using Bill Gates Common Core math that long….you can get this!

Will UT provide the students they murder with their mandatory Gates/Fauci vaccines a Big Orange coffin with a “power T”?

by Horatio Bunce

Ukranian “volunteers” were administered the Gates/Fauci/Moderna vaccine. Over 25% of them are DEAD. Over half of them in the ICU. After the University of Tennessee forces these vaccines on all their students to “keep them safe”, I guess the hospitals will finally get that overrun the CDC fear porn has been promising instead of them declaring bankruptcy due to lack of work in the “pandemic”. Bill Lee should probably get some backhoes ready for the mass graves. 7,000+ dead students….where are they going to put them? Who else will they infect with the shedding of their Gates/Fauci/Moderna vaccine? Why in the world would you trust these de-population nut jobs to a 50% chance of DEATH when you have a 99.3% chance (already field-proven since February) of nothing happening to you if they just go away?

 

Oh? You want to argue they were already sick? “Something else” contributed? Sorry, that’s not how it works in the CDC’s new, re-defined BS junk science world. Any Covid is the cause of death.

 

AND DON’T FORGET. VACCINE MANUFACTURERS AND THE EVIL BILLIONAIRES FUNDING THEM HAVE ZERO LIABILITY FOR THE DEATHS AND DAMAGES THEIR PRODUCT CAUSES.

UT will just say that they were “doing my job” and “keeping you safe” when they dictated the murder of your child. And we’re “all in this together” because everybody knows somebody that was murdered by the Gates/Fauci/Moderna vaccine.